Sovereignty Score

Five questions. Scored 0-3. Two minutes.

Most agent systems cannot refuse an instruction, remember their own decisions, or detect tampering. We scored five major frameworks - none above 9 out of 24 on structural governance. Three principles scored zero across all of them. This check measures where you stand across system governance, identity integrity, and agent participation.

Does each agent in your system have a unique, persistent identity - with its own permissions, memory, and boundaries - that cannot be assumed or overwritten by another agent?

System - Identity Boundaries

Can the agents or operators in your system propose changes to governance rules - and is disagreement formally recorded, not silently overridden?

System - Governance Participation

Does each agent have a self-description - its role, its commitments, what it stands for - that is protected from being quietly rewritten by another process?

Entity - Self-Description Integrity

If an agent's identity or memory were tampered with - its self-description altered, its positions reversed, its history fabricated - would your system detect it?

Entity - Tampering Detection

Can your agents refuse an instruction that conflicts with their defined purpose or principles - and is that refusal treated as a governance signal rather than an error?

Relationship - Refusal as Governance

Industry baseline: 0-3 out of 15. Five major frameworks scored 2-9 out of 24 on full governance assessment.

This is a 5-question governance check across three dimensions: system governance, identity integrity, and agent participation. For a comprehensive 20-question assessment with per-domain breakdown, see the Level 6 Governance Toolkit.

Get resources matched to your score.

One follow-up email with resources for your gaps. No newsletter. No drip. Privacy.